![]() Your last point in your reply is a good thing to go by, yes indeed, it’s not okay to use IP without consent. I personally think the first option will probably not work, and I should drop the idea, but I want to know your opinion. Or do you think I should just drop the entire idea to avoid any more trouble? ![]() Specifically the “substantial portion of the SDK” part points out to me, do you think if I include that license for my decals or whatever, that would work? ![]() (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OFīUSINESS PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OFīUSINESS INFORMATION, OR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY LOSS)ĪRISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THEĮNGINE AND/OR THE SDK, EVEN IF VALVE HAS BEENĪDVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, TITLE AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED ![]() WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SDK, EITHER EXPRESS OTHER MATERIAL DOWNLOADED BY LICENSEE IS PROVIDED You are probably not a lawyer, but what do you think about this? I own the Source SDK aswell.Īpologies, I do not know how to show a specific line in DevForum posts.īut if you look at line 20, the license says:Īny distribution of the SDK or a substantial portion of the SDK must include the aboveĭISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. Hey, you’ve made really great points all around, but I do have one question. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |